Schemes of the Homosexual mercenary in Africa

 It is critical to differentiate between homosexual activists who are trying to force their lifestyle on others and homosexuals who are not trying to force their lifestyle on anyone. 

Homosexuals are people who experience same-sex attraction and who may or may not act on that attraction. Not all homosexuals, including some of those who choose to engage in homosexual sex, support the homosexual agenda. 

Some homosexuals who act on their same-sex attraction openly and honestly admit that their lifestyle is not healthy, but they choose it anyway. Others have sought therapy and have successfully reoriented to heterosexuality, and some are even working to protect traditional marriage and the family. 

In contrast, homosexual activists are people who are pushing an agenda to change our society by changing our laws and values. They are literally seeking to destroy the traditional family. Homosexual activists promote the homosexual agenda, which is a calculated, well-planned, well-organized and well-financed effort to mainstream homosexuality into our society by redefining marriage and family and indoctrinating our children about the homosexual lifestyle. 

We can genuinely care about homosexuals and value them as individuals and still oppose the “homosexual agenda” which is not only harmful to society, but which is also harmful to homosexuals 

The homosexual activists are the ones who are not content simply to “live and let live.” They are the ones who are deliberately and aggressively attempting to destroy all of society’s sexual norms and the essential social institutions—such as marriage and the family—which uphold them.

One of their ten strategies is to the "Bypass the People Strategy", where if they fail to get their agenda passed by a legislature or by a vote of the people, they resort to use the courts. In bypassing the legislature or the vote of the people and taking their cause straight to the courts, they can save time and money. It’s much easier to convince a few judges to mandate their agenda. Activists used this strategy to legalize same-sex marriage by judicial mandate in Massachusetts, Connecticut, California and Iowa. Another way to apply the Bypass the People Strategy is to get policies adopted in UN documents and then use the UN to pressure countries to change their laws.

Some African Countries were the the same strategy of the Homosexual Machinery is evident:

1.  Malawi
2. Ghana       
3. Namibia      
4. Uganda       
5. Eswatini      
6. Kenya

Some Policy documents that promote Homosexuality:

i.                        The EU-ACP Trade Treaty, if ratified in its current form would lead to the automatic legalization of Abortion, Homosexuality, Prostitution, Pornography, and Parental, Cultural and Religious Persecution among others harms.

ii.                      The EAC SRH Bill 2021, if passed by the East African Legislative Assembly, will legalize Abortion, Homosexuality, Prostitution and other harmful practices and thus warrant the persecution of Parental rights, Religious Freedom and Cultural values

Another Avenue where Homosexuality is aggressively fronted is the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group. Below are some of the recent UPR Recommendations given to Countries in order to boost their human rights situation:

• Uganda's UPR
• Togo's UPR
• Sudan's UPR
• South Sudan's UPR
• Zimbabwe's UPR
• Gabon’s UPR 
• Ghana’s UPR  
• Benin’s UPR  
• Tunisia's UPR
• Morocco's UPR
• Algeria's UPR

Read The Homosexual Frenzy: All of us can do something

Debunking the discrimination of Sodomites

 

What is discrimination?

Discrimination is the act of choosing among options. In the context of civil rights, discrimination means accepting or rejecting people based on criteria such as race or skin color. 

Discrimination is a word whose political redefinition originated in the civil rights movement. In normal usage, discrimination is synonymous with discernment, but as used in a civil rights context it means irrational bias against a person. “Irrational” is the hidden qualifier in the term that distinguishes appropriate discernment from prejudice. In an enlightened society there can be no rational basis for discrimination on criteria such as race, skin color or ethnicity. 

Discrimination against harmful conduct is entirely rational, and in many cases necessary. Discrimination is now synonymous with racial prejudice in the public mind. The homosexual movement has exploited this association to legitimize its own claims by adding itself to the list of minorities in anti-discrimination statutes.

Discrimination has been useful to homosexualists because the public is deeply conditioned to associate this term only with prejudice, especially racial prejudice. The solution is to add the qualifier “rational” or “irrational” to discrimination whenever one uses the term. At minimum this tactic causes the hearer to consider the significance of the qualifier. It also sets the stage for a discussion about the standard for determining what is rational vs. irrational discrimination.

Is it wrong to discriminate against homosexuality?

Discrimination based on sex, religion, tribe, race or skin color is morally wrong because there is no legitimate reason for it- the criteria is morally neutral and immutable. Such discrimination springs from irrational prejudice. However, homosexuality involves voluntary sexual conduct that has negative personal and social consequences. It is perfectly reasonable and responsible to discriminate against homosexuality on religious, moral, sociological and public health grounds.

 

What is tolerance?

For most people, “tolerance” means putting up with something we don’t like in order to serve the greater good of public civility.  Tolerance is therefore an essential virtue in a diverse society.  Homosexualists, however, use the term to mean total and unconditional acceptance of homosexuality in all of its aspects.  Anyone who disapproves of homosexual conduct is labeled intolerant, even those who treat self-defined homosexuals with the utmost courtesy and respect.

Abuse of language is a dangerous thing. The misuse of the term tolerance is a good example. For every person that gives in to political correctness to avoid being considered intolerant, there is another whose strong disapproval of homosexuality makes him or her willing to be considered intolerant. The latter may even begin to see intolerance as a virtue, since it appears necessary to be intolerant to stop the legitimization of sexual perversion.

As the homosexuals have proved, many people just don’t think clearly enough to understand why intolerance of race and intolerance of sexual perversion are different. This confusion serves the racists as easily as it serves the homosexuals. To reaffirm the true meaning of tolerance in the face of homosexual sophistry, point out that tolerance is relative. Some things deserve absolute tolerance and some things deserve zero tolerance but most fall somewhere in between. For example, our society should have high tolerance for freedom of speech but low tolerance for harmful behavior and conduct that damages the body and spreads disease. The tolerance a thing deserves is relative to the degree of benefit or harm that it may cause.

Source: 

1. Redeeming The Rainbow 

See also: The Case for Heterosexuality and Are Homosexuals Being Persecuted in Uganda?

A Human Rights Approach to Defeat the Homosexual Agenda

Focus on Fundamental Freedoms

Our strongest positions and arguments are those rooted in the defense of our fundamental freedoms: speech, worship, association and conscience. These are not infallible arguments, because anti-family judges and other decision-makers are often so hostile to pro-family views that they are willing to override their own generally staunch support for these freedoms. However, these are the best arguments we have in the current cultural climate. And, frankly, if we ultimately lose these freedoms, the only options left to us will be capitulation or punishment.

what does it mean to focus on fundamental freedoms? It means couching our arguments in the same civil rights language that our opponents have used so effectively for decades. We become the advocates of freedom of speech, they become the advocates of censorship. We become the victims of discrimination, they become the discriminators.

Protect the Victims and the Vulnerable

If the homosexual agenda is ever defeated anywhere, it will likely be through the work and witness of two groups of its victims: recovered homosexuals and those who have been subjected to “gay” indoctrination as public-school children. This sort of social backlash has been seen once before in America: against the drug culture. Much of the country was persuaded in the 1960s to view mind-altering substances as relatively harmless, and the result was an explosion of drug use, and then an avalanche of social problems. What eventually turned the tide against the drug culture? It was the work and witness of former drug addicts. These victims of the drug culture were immune to all of the clever rhetoric and philosophies that had duped the nation and were zealous to protect others from being harmed as they had been. They knew the truth by their own experience, and the word of their testimony was far more powerful than the lies of the adversaries.

The pro-family movement would be well served to learn from this example and devote a substantial portion of its time and resources both to advancing and growing the ex-“gay” movement and to teaching the pro-family perspective to young people.

A pro-family organization called Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX) has provided exemplary leadership in utilizing this approach. Their primary goal and ministry emphasis in recent years has been ending discrimination against ex-“gays.” PFOX uses all of the civil rights rhetoric and reasoning that the “gay” movement has employed over the past several decades, but to protect a group of people whom the “gays“ insist cannot exist: former homosexuals. The very existence of ex-“gays” demolishes the “gay” doctrine that homosexuality is innate and unchangeable  and gives real hope to all of the many homosexuals who secretly wish to be rid of their deviation. The PFOX pursuit of equal rights for ex-”gays” in the face of intense opposition and hostility by so-called “civil rights” activists and leaders, exposes the hypocrisy of these pro-“gay” bigots to the watching public.

Importantly, while exposing the truth might not be enough to change things in the short term, it has a powerful influence on both the victims of the “gay” agenda and on all of the fair-minded witnesses now watching in uncomfortable silence. As the number of former homosexuals and former public school “brainwashees” grows, there will come a time when the scale tips against the pro-“gay” bullies, and a culture-changing backlash will ensue.

Source: Redeeming The Rainbow

The Case for Heterosexuality

Social science research has conclusively proven that a strong family, based on marriage between a man and a woman, is the best environment for protecting, nourishing and developing individuals—this family structure provides significantly better outcomes than any other alternative.

There are specific social benefits called “social goods,” which flow from man/woman marriage. These social goods are derived from the complementary physical, emotional, and spiritual union of a male and a female.

The institution of man/woman marriage:

• Channels sexual relations in a manner that provides the greatest benefit to individuals and society.

• Helps men live more responsibly and productively.

• Transforms men into husbands/fathers and women into wives/mothers.

• Binds potential parents together to raise the biological children they create.

• Legally binds fathers to their biological children. (Mothers are always present at birth, but not so with fathers.)

• Provides the optimal environment in which to raise children.

• Generates the best outcomes in the areas of health, wealth and overall happiness for men, women and children.

Research findings illustrate that the “social goods” derived from man/woman marriage begin to disappear when individuals live outside of the married man/woman family structure. Studies show that any deviation from man/woman marriage generally results in serious negative outcomes for individuals and families. The evidence supporting this is remarkably consistent and compelling.

Outcomes According to Family Structure:

When compared to heterosexual men, men who engage in homosexual behavior:

• experience a significantly higher rate of domestic violence with their partners.

• are up to seven times more likely to attempt suicide.

• have a lower life expectancy by 20 to 30 years.

• have an incidence of HIV/AIDS that is up to 430 times higher.

• have three times the number of drug and alcohol dependencies.

• are significantly more promiscuous, with very few maintaining fidelity.

• are more than twice as likely to have an STD.

• are significantly more likely to engage in pedophilia.

• are much more likely to have mental and emotional disorders/illnesses.

• are at higher risk of deliberate self-harm.

When compared to heterosexual youth, youth who engage in homosexual behavior:

• are at increased risk of suffering major depression and generalized anxiety disorder.

• are associated with more school and runaway problems.

• are more likely to attempt suicide.

• experience a much higher rate of alcoholism.

• are more likely to engage in substance abuse.

• are more likely to engage in high-risk sexual behavior.

When compared to heterosexual women, lesbian women:

• are significantly more likely to be victims of domestic violence.

• experience a much higher rate of sexual coercion by their partner.

• are more likely to use drugs and alcohol.

• have a significantly higher risk of developing general anxiety disorder.

• are twice as likely to attempt suicide.

• are at higher risk for breast cancer.

• are at higher risk of deliberate self-harm.

Source: Stand For The Family

Debunking Sexual and Reproductive Health (and Rights)

It is critical to understand the worldwide agenda behind the term Sexual and Reproductive Health(SRH). SRH used to mean having a healthy sexual and reproductive system with the absence of disease or dysfunction. But its meaning has been corrupted, making it one of the most controversial terms globally.

According to (WHO, 2015) Sexual Health, Human Rights and the Law ,  SRH has proved to be a trojan horse for Abortion, Homosexuality, Prostitution et.c

‘‘Sexual health … encompasses not only certain aspects of reproductive health – such as being able to control one’s fertility through access to contraception and abortion, but also, the possibility of having pleasurable and safe sexual experiences.’’ (Pg 1 Executive Summary)

‘‘Indeed, it has become clear that human sexuality includes many different forms of behaviour and expression, and that the recognition of the diversity of sexual behaviour and expression contributes to people’s overall sense of well-being and health.’’ (Pg 1 Executive Summary)

‘‘All countries should work toward decriminalization of sex work and elimination of the unjust application of non-criminal laws and regulations against people engaged in sex work’’. (Pg 28, 3.4.10-People engaged in sex work).

‘‘Various countries around the world have legalized same-sex marriages to protect fundamental human rights, including access to health services and social benefits’’ (Pg 21, 3.4.2 – Marital Status)

‘‘for people whose deeply felt gender does not correspond to their sex assigned at birth, access to hormonal treatment or gender reassignment surgery, or other treatment, may be needed for the protection of their health including their sexual health.’’  (Pg 14, 3.1- Introduction)

The EU Parliament's adopted Matic Report revealed that SRHR included Abortion, Homosexuality et.c

B. .. sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are, according to the WHO, an umbrella term for various issues affecting all persons and representing four separate areas: sexual health, sexual rights, reproductive health and reproductive rights, and they are based on the rights of all individuals to have their bodily integrity, privacy and personal autonomy respected; have their sexual orientation and gender identity fully respected; to decide whether, with whom and when to be sexually active; to have safe sexual experiences, decide whether, when and who to marry, whether and by what means to have a child or children, and how many children; …; (Pg 7/39)

J. whereas SRH services are essential healthcare services that should be available to all and include comprehensive, evidence-based and age-appropriate sexuality and relationship education; information, confidential and unbiased counselling and services for sexual and reproductive health and well-being; information and counselling on modern contraception, as well as access to a wide range of modern contraceptives; antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care; midwifery; obstetric and newborn care; safe and legal abortion care and services,…(Pg 9/39)

For the sake of our children, we must demand any and all provisions to SRH(R) to be deleted from our Public Policies.

See More:

1. 7 Mins Video Clip Road to Nairobi
2. 4 Mins Video Clip Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH)
3. 5 Mins Video Clip Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR)

Problematic Provisions in NDP III

 

Uganda’s (National Development Plan) NDP III is infiltrated with problematic and controversial terms that are points of contention between the liberal western world and conservative countries in UN negotiations.

The NDP III has aspires to Increase access to Sexual Reproductive Health (SRH) and Rights (Pg 175), which according to (WHO, 2015) Sexual Health, Human Rights and the Law ,  has proved to be a trojan horse for Abortion, Homosexuality, Prostitution among others. See  Sexual & Reproductive Health (SRH) , Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR)

NDP III also mentions sexual and reproductive health information and services (Pg 170), information on Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) (Pg 165) , which are useful euphemisms for, Comprehensive Sexuality Education, which according to stopCSE.org, has  Harmful Concepts such as teaching  children to masturbate, homosexuality ,  abortion,    condoms to children,    disrespect for parents and religious and cultural values among others. See  The War on Children

Some ambiguous terms included gender mainstreaming (Pg 84), gender-based violence (Pg 88, Pg 176, Pg 187, Pg 188), gender sensitive (Pg 110), gender response (Pg 113), gender inequality (Pg 172, Pg 176, Pg 186), and Gender equality (Pg 176, Pg 176) among others.

 

How “Gender” Terms are Often Used or Interpreted:

•  “gender-sensitive” = LGBT-sensitive
• “gender-based violence” = LGBT-based violence

 

Gender-based violence” has been defined to encompass denial of abortion and violence against LGBT people e.g In General Comment 35 on gender-based violence, the CEDAW Committee declared the “criminalization of abortion” to be a form of “gender-based violence”

The UN Women FAQs  on types of violence against women and girls states  “The term [gender-based violence] is also sometimes used to describe targeted violence against LGBTQI+ populations, when referencing violence related to norms of masculinity/femininity and/or gender norms.”

The state of Oregon in the U.S. defines “gender sensitive” as Materials and instruction strategies that is sensitive to individual’s similarities and differences regarding gender role, gender identity and/or sexual orientation.

For the sake of our children, Let's demand any and all provisions to such controversial Terms to be deleted from not only the NDP but also all Public Policies.

See some Recommended Actions for NPA to cleanse the Policy Document

Problematic Terms in Uganda’s NDP III & Recommended Action

 

No.	Problematic Terms	Recommended Action
1.	6. Increase access to Sexual Reproductive Health (SRH) and Rights[1] with special focus on family planning services and harmonised information Pg 175	6. Increase access to Sexual Reproductive Health (SRH) and Rights with special focus on family planning services and harmonised information quality, affordable and accessible health care for women Pg 175
2.	9. Provide a framework for gender[2] mainstreaming, equity and human rights and eradication of child labour in the mining industry Pg 84	9. Provide a framework for gender mainstreaming equal opportunities for women and girls, equity and human rights and eradication of child labour in the mining industry Pg 84
3.	184 With careful planning and implementation, the oil and gas industry has the opportunity to contribute across all development indicators, either by enhancing its positive contributions or by avoiding or mitigating negative impacts to ensure that “no one is left behind”. …. the challenges that all development agendas seek to address, mainly climate change and environmental degradation, population displacement, economic and social inequality, armed conflicts, gender-based violence[3], tax evasion and corruption, increased risk of certain health problems, and the violation of human rights... Pg 88	184 With careful planning and implementation, the oil and gas industry has the opportunity to contribute across all development indicators, either by enhancing its positive contributions or by avoiding or mitigating negative impacts to ensure that “no one is left behind”. …. the challenges that all development agendas seek to address, mainly climate change and environmental degradation, population displacement, economic and social inequality, armed conflicts, gender-based violence against women, tax evasion and corruption, increased risk of certain health problems, and the violation of human rights... Pg 88
4.	e. Establish functional gender sensitive regional and zonal management committee for water resources; Pg 110	e. Establish functional gender sensitive effective regional and zonal management committee for water resources that take into account the different needs of women/girls; Pg 110
5.	b. Build gender response capacity in climate change monitoring and evaluation through integration in local government performance assessment and national monitoring frameworks; Pg 113	b. Build gender response capacity in climate change monitoring and evaluation systems that ensure equal access to resources for women through integration in local government performance assessment and national monitoring frameworks; Pg 113
6.	5) To reduce vulnerability and gender inequality along the lifecycle; and Pg 172	5) To reduce vulnerability and gender inequality between women and men along the lifecycle; and Pg 172
7.	Objective 5: Reduce vulnerability and gender inequality along the lifecycle Pg 176	Objective 5: Reduce vulnerability and gender inequality between women and men along the lifecycle Pg 176
8.	6. Scale up Gender Based Violence (GBV) prevention and response interventions at all levels Pg 176	6. Scale up Gender Based Violence against women (GBV) prevention and response interventions at all levels Pg 176
9.	7. Support Gender equality and Equity Responsive Budgeting in all Sectors and Local Governments Pg 176	7. Support Gender equality between women and men and Equity Responsive Budgeting in all Sectors and Local Governments Pg 176
10.	8. Implement a National Male Involvement Strategies in promotion of gender equality Pg 176	8. Implement a National Male Involvement Strategies in promotion of gender equality between women and men Pg 176
11.	(ix) Reduction in prevalence of negative social norms and cultural practices that perpetuate gender inequality Pg 186	(ix) Reduction in prevalence of negative social norms and cultural practices that perpetuate gender inequality between women and men Pg 186
12.	416 There are several behavioural barriers to adoption of positive mind sets cushioned by long years of social conditioning. … High rates of child marriages, teenage pregnancies, gender-based violence, female genital mutilation (FGM), and child sacrifice are manifestation of a failing social safety net Pg 187	416 There are several behavioural barriers to adoption of positive mind sets cushioned by long years of social conditioning. … High rates of child marriages, teenage pregnancies, gender-based violence against women and girls, female genital mutilation (FGM), and child sacrifice are manifestation of a failing social safety net Pg 187
13.	418 Participation of cultural and religious institutions in community development programmes has not been institutionalized. .., some cultures still practise negative cultural behaviours such as child sacrifice, child marriages, FGM, gender-based violence (GBV) and limited use of indigenous knowledge to support creative industries Pg 188	418 Participation of cultural and religious institutions in community development programmes has not been institutionalized. .., some cultures still practise negative cultural behaviours such as child sacrifice, child marriages, FGM, gender-based violence against women and girls (GBV) and limited use of indigenous knowledge to support creative industries Pg 188
14.	364 However, Uganda’s human capital is characterised by low labour productivity (38 percent), low human development (HDI at 0.516) and fewer STEI graduates (2 out of 5 are STEI graduates). This is mainly attributed to: (i) weak foundation for human capital; … limited information[4] on Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH); … (ix) gender and other inequalities... Pg 165	364 However, Uganda’s human capital is characterised by low labour productivity (38 percent), low human development (HDI at 0.516) and fewer STEI graduates (2 out of 5 are STEI graduates). This is mainly attributed to: (i) weak foundation for human capital; … limited information on Sexual and Reproductive Optimal Health (SRH); … (ix) gender and other inequalities against women and girls... Pg 165
15.	from the lowest wealth quintile compared to 15 percent from the highest quintile; HIV prevalence increases rapidly with age in this age group, most especially among adolescent girls where it increases from 0.5 percent at 15 years to 5.1 percent by 20 years; … low access to sexual and reproductive health information and services; … and gender related exclusions from socio-economic opportunities, contravening the leave no one behind agenda. . Pg 170	from the lowest wealth quintile compared to 15 percent from the highest quintile; HIV prevalence increases rapidly with age in this age group, most especially among adolescent girls where it increases from 0.5 percent at 15 years to 5.1 percent by 20 years; … low access to sexual and reproductive health information and services vital health; … and gender related exclusions from socio-economic opportunities based on one’s sex. . Pg 170
16.	Gender[5]	Replace “gender” with “sex” Define gender as male and female

 

---

[1] Sexual and Reproductive Health, which according to (WHO, 2015) Sexual Health, Human Rights and the Law ,  has proved to be a trojan horse for Abortion, Homosexuality, Prostitution among others. See  Sexual & Reproductive Health (SRH) , Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR)

[2] How “Gender” Terms are Often Used or Interpreted:

“gender analysis” = LGBT analysis

“gender-sensitive” = LGBT-sensitive

“gender-based violence” = LGBT-based violence

“based on gender” = based on LGBT status

“gender-sensitive schools” = LGBT-sensitive schools

 

[3] “Gender-based violence” has been defined to encompass denial of abortion and violence against LGBT people e.g In General Comment 35 on gender-based violence, the CEDAW Committee declared the “criminalization of abortion” to be a form of “gender-based violence that, depending on the circumstances, may amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”( Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. (2017). General recommendation No. 35 on gender based violence against women, updating general recommendation No. 19. CEDAW/C/GC/35.)

 

[4] This is a useful euphemism for, Comprehensive Sexuality Education, which according to stopCSE.org, has  Harmful Concepts such as teaching  children to masturbate, homosexuality ,  abortion,    condoms to children,    disrespect for parents and religious and cultural values among others. See details here The War on Children

 

[5] The term “gender” was once used exclusively to describe biological sex (male and female) but is increasingly being used in UN documents to mainstream multiple controversial genders, such as transgender, bigender, pangender and evolved to encompass over 80-100Genders. See the Master List of Gender Diversities.  (Facebook recognizes over 50 genders.)